In my
practice as a teacher I wanted to have as much of my material in open spaces as
possible. That was party because I wanted my students and their parents to be
able to take part of it anytime and anywhere, but also because I wanted other
teachers to be able to use my material if they wanted. As teachers we tend to
invent the wheel over and over again, and I know first-hand how much easier
your job gets when you can get inspired by how others have done, or just plain
use someone else’s material. By sharing my work it became part of other
teachers’ personal learning environment and I became part of their personal
learning network, as Kay Oddone puts it in her blog post about PNE PLN, LMS and
ONL. Funnily enough, this has led to my children sometimes hearing my voice on
their iPad when doing homework by watching a video their teachers assigned.
Universities
are opening up course after course, and people are taking them! As Martin Weller
states in chapter 1 in The Battle for Open, as early as 2011 a course on AI
attracted 160 000 learners. Since I’m not teaching anymore, but instead
producing e-learning for companies and organisations, I’ve learned that they
have very different approaches to sharing the productions online. A.W. Bates
discusses openness in education in Teaching in a Digital Age, and one of the trends
we see in the EdTech business as well is in fact openness – and the reasons for
this seem to be different for different companies.
Sometimes
sharing is about attracting employees, because if a company makes some of their
e-learning public it shows potential employees that they care about employee
development and learning. It also enables employees to take part in company
learning from basically anywhere, which as you may recall was one of my reasons
for making my content as a teacher open to everyone.
Now, when
a company e-learning is open for everyone, the LMS gets another type of
functionality. Some companies solves this by putting e-learning outside the
LMS, and tests and certifications inside the LMS. That way they still know
which employees have the knowledge they need.
Some companies
seem to view openness as an issue of goodwill. In making knowledge accessible to
everyone they simply look good.
And of
course there are companies which are driven by a moral view of knowledge as
something that should be accessible to everyone regardless of economical or
geographical preconditions. If more people have more knowledge, the world
becomes a better place.
Open
courses in higher education is indeed different than the open courses companies
publish. When it comes to the courses I produce I never have any interaction
with the learners, only with the stakeholders and subject matter experts. Even
the blended learning courses I produce leaves the learner interactions to a
teacher, I simply produce the material they use.
In some
ways I miss learner interaction, and I hope that eventually I will find an
employer where I can do both!
Kommentarer
Skicka en kommentar